How It Would Work

The best system known to this blog for insuring guns to provide for victims, discourage unsafe practices and not excessively burden gun owners is a Top-Down no-fault personal injury protection insurance system similar to the way that motor vehicle insurance currently works for pedestrians in NY state and Michigan.

Top-Down as it’s used on this blog is not a standard insurance term. It means that insurance would be required only of the entity which brings a firearm newly into the system. It could be a manufacturer, an importer or, if the existing stock of guns is being brought in, one current owner. The required insurance should have terms that allow an insurer to relinquish responsibility only if responsibility is taken up by a new insurer on these same terms. All guns would have a responsible insurer because any break in the chain would leave the last insurer responsible. Guns which are lost or stolen remain the responsibility of the last insurer. There needs to be a system for tracing the responsibility to the insurer as of the date of an incident leading to a claim, but it is not necessary to know where the gun is or who owns it. This means that there is no need for government entities to register guns or interface with individual owners to enforce the system.

There are many systems of No-Fault insurance in use for motor vehicles and in other situations. The essential element is that benefits not be dependant on negligence or fault on the part of someone. Historically, the reasons for adopting No-Fault systems is to have benefits paid quickly, to all injured persons and without the expense of litigation. This element is critical to providing for victims of gun violence. Other elements sometimes found in No-Fault motor vehicle insurance include having the victim’s insurance pay first and relieving negligent parties of some or all tort liability. These elements are not desirable in the case of gun insurance.

There should be a pool to pay benefits to persons injured where no insurer is identifiable to make payments. In the states with No-Fault personal injury protection this pool is generally funded by assessing insurers on the basis of the premiums that each insurer collects. It is desirable to keep this pool as small as possible, so it should only pay after other sources are exhausted.

No-Fault insurance generally has a hierarchy sources of benefits responsible for paying claims in particular cases. Gun insurance should be at the top to motivate insurers to encourage safe practices, the pool should be at the bottom. States, in the case of motor vehicles, have been quite creative in identifying secondary insurance sources. For persons injured by guns in this system a recommended order, quite similar to the typical one for motor vehicle No-Fault insurance, is:

  1. Gun Insurance attached to the firearm causing the injury.
  2. Gun Insurance attached to another gun owned or possessed by the shooter.
  3. Gun Insurance attached to a gun owned or kept in the household of the shooter.
  4. Gun Insurance attached to a gun owned or possessed by the victim
  5. Any applicable non-gun insurance such as household, liability, medical, Medicare or Medicaid.
  6. The pool for payment in cases of unknown or uninsured guns.

The limits to payment for insurance in the case of vehicles vary widely from as little as $10,000 through $50,000 in NY State and to unlimited lifetime medical benefits in Michigan. Death benefits are generally smaller. As gun injuries can be quite severe limits should be substantial for medical care. About one half of that cost is currently paid by Medicaid and would be saved to the taxpayers. A significant death benefit with coverage for suicide is important to motivate safe practices. Exclusions for victims engaged in criminal acts should be handled with care. Alleged, uncertain, prior or minor criminal behavior should not block benefits.

People reacting to this proposed system, if they are not extreme either in wanting to punish gun owners or in wanting not to hold them responsible at all, commonly worry that it might not be possible for insurance to cover intentional or illegal acts. The benefits here go to the victim not the shooter. It may be important to limit secondary benefits such as relief of tort liability to shooters. There are many kinds of insurance in common use today that provide benefits to innocent third parties for the intentional or illegal acts of otherwise insured parties. Examples include:

  1. In some states required motor vehicle liability insurance must pay innocent parties harmed intentionally by insured drivers.
  2. Standard homeowners insurance usually has a “union” or “standard” or “New York” mortgage clause that would pay a lender for arson by the owner.
  3. Business liability insurance often has a “separation of interests clause” that protects the company in the case of intentional acts of employees.
  4. Performance bonds often pay if the contractor absconds with the funds.

For centuries, the insurance industry has been able to find creative ways to deal with almost any risk that is important to society. It has a long record of facilitating activities while reducing the harm of unavoidable risk. It seems that both the need to reduce the harm associated with guns and the demand that guns be widely available are irresistible forces. A means to reconcile these two poles must and will be found. Insurance is one of the tools that can contribute but only if it is designed to do the job.

6 thoughts on “How It Would Work

  1. Pingback: Insurance-Good for Victims, Safety and Gun Owners | Gun Insurance Blog

  2. Pingback: Suggestions for HR-1369 Firearm Risk Protection Act of 2013 | Gun Insurance Blog

  3. GUNS
    The Federal government needs to step up and use our Free Market to solve the Gun Control issue. The Insurance industry can help responsible gun owners have their guns and prevent bad people from getting them. They make their investments the safest possible by making sure prospective gun owners have the necessary skills and not on Federal Lists that would disqualify them. They will place each client in their own risk level and charge them competitively with other agents. Because insurance agents have no control where guns are sold; they can’t keep records of where they are. Like autos, guns also have their own ID #. A Federal law, requiring every gun owner to carry a minimum liability policy; allows the Feds to maintain a simple data base for all guns, who owns them and the licensed insurance agent. Before the sale is complete, both the new owner and agent must be recorded in the registry, using the technology we presently have. If either name is missing, the gun is flagged and the local police are automatically contacted. This allows the local authorities to be involved.
    After 6 months; any gun owner caught without insurance is fined. If it’s used to commit a crime, a much bigger fine and jail sentence will be automatically imposed on the registered owner on record.
    Insurance companies and the responsible gun owners do all the work. Damages are paid. EVERYONE IS FREE TO PURCHASE ANY WEAPON THEY WANT, INCLUDING THE INSURANCE. Owners of the guns assume their rightful responsibilities. THIS IS THE FREE MARKET WORKING WITHOUT GOV. REGULATIONS except to regulate against force and fraud.
    Big Government is not invading our privacy. Its protecting us all with its regulation and our 2nd Amendment is safe.

    • because the free market works in the first place for anything but the individuals desire to profit from abusing the rules at the cost/harm of another. A free market would only work if all parties in a free market followed the rules, the moment one party breaks the rules they gain a market advantage and soon many parties are breaking the rules to gain the same advantage to compete. In short when you add greed with free reign, things like responsibility and morals are the first to go in favor of getting an advantage on the market (also keep in mind the free market in its freedom allows for the big guns in many market to use their weight to shape the rules of the market to favor them and as such are hypocrites that only take action to the people breaking the rules when it suites them while they themselves are able to work the rules for self benefit)

      The average person is proven to only have their own self interest at heart first before everyone else this may be what defines capitalism but its also what makes any free market faulty and prone to corruption and greed.

      thats why the law exists to force everyone to play by the same rules (not just the rules that suite them at the time)

  4. Pingback: Mandatory gun insurance: an interesting smart idea that won't really work. A primer, from a finance and insurance geek. » The Truth About Maryland

  5. This can be almost certainly the explanation why the term NfJQpbcwWYEs ‘pyramid’ was coined – but this can be not necessarily a bad factor as far as the Mlm company is concerned. What it merely implies is the fact that the wide the network that you simply have, the additional possibilities for profit you’ll have.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *