A Straightforward Recommendation for Gun Insurance


To require additional individual responsibility such as locking up firearms

To provide victims with needed funds for medical and other costs

To make those causing the deaths and injuries pay, rather than the public through Medicaid or the victims through private health insurance

To supplement public regulatory oversight with private insurance company oversight

To encourage new technologies such as “safe guns” that would reduce accidents

(below the fold)


Car insurance requires drivers to make a financial investment that encourages safer driving. Drivers do not want their rates to go up due to casual mistakes. Besides knowing there can be a criminal charge for drunk driving or other risky behavior, there is the knowledge that one’s insurance can be taken away so one cannot drive. Car owners are less likely to let family and friends who do not belong behind the wheel to take their cars for fear of losing insurance.

Car insurance assures that pedestrians and people in other cars who are harmed through fault or accident will be compensated. The victim can receive money for medical and rehabilitation treatment (which may be long term), for lost wages, and for other burdensome costs. If a death occurs, the victim’s family not only will have funeral expenses paid but far more importantly will have the financial resources necessary to maintain themselves.

Car insurance guarantees that the culpable person whose conscious disregard, negligence, carelessness or even belligerence caused harm must assume the costs rather than having them shifted to the victim’s insurance or to the public via Medicaid.

Car insurance companies work for prevention. They want to avoid losses and take pains to encourage safer driving and safer operation of cars in public places. They work systematically for prevention and anticipate problems. They refuse insurance to those with bad records. They operate in all 50 states and are independent of legal regulations or lack of them. They often have more staff to provide oversight than government entities. They have a build-in enforcement system.

Car insurance companies look at the potentially dangerous item insured not just the owner. They encourage innovation to make a vehicle safer to help make up for human error.

4 thoughts on “A Straightforward Recommendation for Gun Insurance

  1. several big problems: first, you don’t immunize against the criminal attacker suing the victim–if a person attacks another, the attacker should not profit (Mike Brown’s family should not be able to profit from the fact he attacked a cop), second, the way you want this to work, a person can have firearms stored in locked safe inside a locked closet inside of a locked room inside of a locked house and still be penalized by whoever the criminal who stole the firearm shot

    • I understand where you’re coming from, we all want to feel protected and assured that those who own guns have insurance for the unfortunate events that may occur. However, the shootings are not an insurance matter, the intentional acts that people are most fearful of when it comes to guns will not insure these types of issues. It’s important that citizens are afforded their constitutional rights, while still abiding to the state laws of gun ownership. The more restrictions on law abiding citizens who use their gun for protection, the more we are enabling the illegal gun users.

  2. The second amendment gives people the right to own and bear arms. While there is a strong incentive for laws requiring motor vehicle insurance to protect the inevitable, a car accident, the same incentive does not apply to gun liability insurance. There is a 2% chance that a firearm will go off unintentionally, whereas a 98% chance that the firearm will be shot intentionally. Do we want firearm owners to rest assured they are ïnsured when they shoot intentionally?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *